Summary
The appellate court reversed the trial court's valuation because it had based its findings on an outdated valuation report.
See Also
Appellate Court Reverses Trial Court’s Decision Because Findings Were Based on Old Valuation
The trial court held that husband's marital interest in Garman Co. Inc. consisted of his marital shares in Garman valued at $40,550, plus the additional contribution of husband's share of the retained earnings reinvested in the company during the marriage, $171,467.