Coyne’s & Co., Inc. v. Enesco, LLC

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 16, 2010

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (10,230 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3269 Pottery Products, NEC
327110 Pottery, Ceramics, and Plumbing Fixture Manufacturing
tort
Coyne’s & Co., Inc. v. Enesco, LLC
2010 WL 3269977 (D. Minn.)
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States District Court
James VictorGarvey, Kelly A.Swanson, Michael J.Steinlage, Paul L.Ratelle, Thomas A.Forker, Thomas R.Dee
Arthur Cobb (plaintiff)
Davis

Summary

Court admits testimony of lost profits expert under Daubert, despite his overly simplistic analysis, including an alleged failure to consider such basic factors as incremental costs and intervening economic factors.
Coyne’s & Co., Inc. v. Enesco, LLC
PDF, Size: 227 KB

See Also

Can an Expert’s Method Be Too Simple Under Daubert?

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2010

Court admits testimony of lost profits expert under Daubert, despite his overly simplistic analysis, including an alleged failure to consider such basic factors as incremental costs and intervening economic factors.

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar