Covert v. Covert

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 28, 2004

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,745 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8042 Offices and Clinics of Optometrists
621320 Offices of Optometrists
marital dissolution/divorce
Covert v. Covert
2004 Ohio App. LEXIS 3190
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Douglas B. Dougherty, John F. Berry
Heinz Ickert, CPA (for wife)
Harsha

Summary

The issue in this case was the value of an optometry practice.
Covert v. Covert
PDF, Size: 49 KB

See Also

Competition from Walmart significantly reduces small business value

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2004

In this case, the trial court rejected the expert’s testimony and conducted its own valuation of husband’s optometry practice.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium