Cline v. Sunoco

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 3, 2019

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,817 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5541 Gasoline Service Stations
447190 Other Gasoline Stations
economic damages & lost profits, expert testimony
daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, economic damages & lost profits, rule 702, reliability, class certification, expert qualifications
Cline v. Sunoco
2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171969
US
Federal Court
Oklahoma
United States District Court
Barbara A. Ley (plaintiff); unknown (defendant)
Gibney

Summary

In class-certification context, court says plaintiff’s damages expert meets Rule 702/Daubert requirements as they apply in early stage of litigation; expert is qualified, and, damages model, even if not fully developed, provides a sufficiently reliable way to calculate damages on classwide basis.
Cline v. Sunoco
PDF, Size: 505 KB

See Also

Expert Testimony Offered at Class-Certification Stage Survives Daubert Challenge

Court Case Digests
October 3, 2019

In class-certification context, court says plaintiff’s damages expert meets Rule 702/Daubert requirements as they apply in early stage of litigation; expert is qualified, and, damages model, even if not fully developed, provides a sufficiently reliable way to calculate damages on classwide basis.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition