City of Tuscaloosa, et al. v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc., et al.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 23, 1998

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (16,290 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
antitrust
City of Tuscaloosa, et al. v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc., et al.
No. 95-6234 (11th Cir. 1998)
US
Federal Court
11th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
James McClave, Perry Garner, CPA, Robert Lanzillotti, Ph.D.
Tjoflat

Summary

The 11th Circuit reversed a district court's grant of summary judgment against Tuscaloosa in this antitrust action. The city attempted to show that the conspirators engaged in conscious parallelism.
City of Tuscaloosa, et al. v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc., et al.
PDF, Size: 123 KB

See Also

CPA’s Testimony Is Admissible Under Daubert

Legal and Court Case Update
October 23, 1998

The 11th Circuit reversed a district court's grant of summary judgment against Tuscaloosa in this antitrust action. The city attempted to show that the conspirators engaged in conscious parallelism.