Chao v. Hall Holding Co., Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 3, 2002

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (14,815 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
ESOP valuations
Chao v. Hall Holding Co., Inc.
285 F.3d 415, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5929
US
6th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Bruce Den Uyl (for Chao)<br>James Cunningham (for Hall)<br>Karen Brown (for Hall)
Zatkoff

Summary

In her complaint, the Secretary alleged that various components of an employee stock ownership plan (hereinafter "ESOP") for the benefit of employees of a subsidiary of Hall Holding Company violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Chao v. Hall Holding Co., Inc.
PDF, Size: 147 KB

See Also

No Prudent Investigation Into FMV Was Breach of Fiduciary Duty to ESOP

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2002

Secretary Chao of the U.S. Department of Labor brought action against Hall Holding Co. and others on the grounds that they breached their fiduciary duty by purchasing Hall Holding stock for the employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) without determination of fair market value of that stock.