Cartwright v. Jackson Capital Partners, Ltd. P'ship

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 21, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (18,305 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6733 Trusts, Except Educational, Religious, and Charitable
523991 Trust, Fiduciary, and Custody Activities
economic damages & lost profits
damages, expert testimony, admissibility, appraisal, asset approach, rule 702, expert report, appreciation, net income
Cartwright v. Jackson Capital Partners, Ltd. P'ship
2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 361
US
State Court
Tennessee
Court of Appeals
Z. Christopher Mercer (plaintiff); N. Gordon Thompson; (defendants)
Gibson

Summary

In trust dispute, appeals court affirms trial court’s exclusion of expert’s “asset appraisal and valuation,” finding business valuator’s approach for measuring damages was inconsistent with scope of the case, irrelevant, and not helpful to trier of fact.
Cartwright v. Jackson Capital Partners, Limited Partnership
PDF, Size: 423 KB

See Also

No Place for Asset Appraisal in Trust Dispute, Court Says

Legal and Court Case Update
August 2015

In trust dispute, appeals court affirms trial court’s exclusion of expert’s “asset appraisal and valuation,” finding business valuator’s approach for measuring damages was inconsistent with scope of the case, irrelevant, and not helpful to trier of fact.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition