Summary
District court rejects plaintiff’s Daubert challenge finding defendants’ expert may “inaugurate” reasonable royalty analysis by referring to plaintiff’s existing licenses; however, licenses did not demonstrate an established royalty considering their lack ...
Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (II)
PDF, Size: 340 KB
See Also
In Billion-Dollar IP Case, Expert’s Mention of Total Revenue Does Not Violate Uniloc
District court rejects defendants’ Daubert challenge finding plaintiff’s expert’s reference to total revenue was legitimate starting point of apportionment analysis and did not amount to use of Entire Market Value Rule.