Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 24, 2012
3674 Semiconductors and Related Devices
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
intellectual property
economic damages & lost profits

Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (I)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120560
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
Catherine M. Lawton (plaintiff); Creighton Hoffman (defendants)
Fischer

Summary

District court rejects defendants’ Daubert challenge finding plaintiff’s expert’s reference to total revenue was legitimate starting point of apportionment analysis and did not amount to use of Entire Market Value Rule.
Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group (I)
PDF, Size: 303 KB

See Also

In Billion-Dollar IP Case, Expert’s Mention of Total Revenue Does Not Violate Uniloc

District court rejects defendants’ Daubert challenge finding plaintiff’s expert’s reference to total revenue was legitimate starting point of apportionment analysis and did not amount to use of Entire Market Value Rule.