Carbo Ceramics, Inc. v. Keefe

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 26, 2006

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,499 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3295 Minerals and Earths, Ground or Otherwise Treated
212325 Clay and Ceramic and Refractory Minerals Mining
intellectual property
Carbo Ceramics, Inc. v. Keefe
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1995
US
Federal Court
5th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Bryan Benoit (plaintiff)
Reavley

Summary

Lost profits calculation in trade secret misappropriation case requires strict adherence to precedent, including “reasonable royalty” method ...
Carbo Ceramics, Inc. v. Keefe
PDF, Size: 46 KB

See Also

The Importance of Legal Precedent: How One Valuation Client Lost a $3.9 Million Damages Claim

Legal and Court Case Update
April 2006

Lost profits calculation in trade secret misappropriation case requires strict adherence to precedent, including “reasonable royalty” method ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition