Calloway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 14, 2009

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,465 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3949 Sporting and Athletic Goods, NEC
339920 Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
intellectual property
expert testimony
Calloway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.
2010 WL 725728 (D. Del.)
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States District Court
Richard L Stanley
Brian Napper (plaintiff)
Robinson

Summary

Court denies Daubert challenge to patent damages expert, holding that financial proof of lost profits need not create “fantasy” world, only a “but for” world.
Calloway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.
PDF, Size: 121 KB

See Also

Creating ‘But-for’ World of Patent Damages Is Not the Same as ‘Fantasy’ World

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2010

Court denies Daubert challenge to patent damages expert, holding that financial proof of lost profits need not create “fantasy” world, only a “but for” world.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar