Business Machines Sales and Service, Inc. v. Robert E. Murphy

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 19, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,202 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5044 Office Equipment
423420 Office Equipment Merchant Wholesalers
contract
Business Machines Sales and Service, Inc. v. Robert E. Murphy
No. A04-1154 (Minn. App. 2005), unpublished
US
State Court
Minnesota
Court of Appeals
Andrew S. Birrell, Bruce A. Finzen, David L. Mitchell, John P. Morgan, R. Travis Snider
Kenneth HIrschey
Peterson

Summary

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed a lost profits award in this breach of a consulting agreement matter because the expert used the national average annual real wage growth for the United States business sector as a proxy for growth in sales of a particular region or industry.
Business Machines Sales and Service, Inc. v. Robert E. Murphy
PDF, Size: 37 KB

See Also

National Average Wage Growth Statistic Inappropriate Proxy for Growth in Net Gross Profits in Particular Industry in Particular Region

Legal and Court Case Update
April 19, 2005

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed a lost profits award in this breach of a consulting agreement matter because the expert used the national average annual real wage growth for the United States business sector as a proxy for growth in sales of a particular region or industry.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition