Bruno v. Bozzuto’s, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 19, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (12,371 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5411 Grocery Stores
445110 Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers (except Convenience Retailers)
contract
damages, daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, discounted cash flow (DCF), reliability, projections
Bruno v. Bozzuto’s, Inc.
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156339
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
James N. Dragotto, Dr. Murli Rajan (plaintiffs); John A. Slavek, David M. Duffus (defendant)
Brann

Summary

Court excludes plaintiffs’ DCF-based damages calculation, finding it suffers from “garbage-in, garbage-out” problem; plaintiffs’ experts based cash flow analysis on defendant’s preliminary projections rather than subsequently available actual sales data.
Bruno v. Bozzuto’s, Inc.
PDF, Size: 341 KB

See Also

Court Excludes Pro Forma-Based Economic Damages Analysis

Legal and Court Case Update
February 2016

Court excludes plaintiffs’ DCF-based damages calculation, finding it suffers from “garbage-in, garbage-out” problem; plaintiffs’ experts based cash flow analysis on defendant’s preliminary projections rather than subsequently available actual sales data.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition