Broyles v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 7, 2016

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,665 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6211 Security Brokers, Dealers, and Flotation Companies
523999 Miscellaneous Financial Investment Activities
securities litigation
daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, rule 702, securities fraud
Broyles v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74597
US
Federal Court
Louisiana
United States District Court
Theodore Urban (plaintiffs); unknown (defendants)
Brady

Summary

Court rules expert testimony based solely on experience may be admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, notwithstanding Daubert requirements.
Broyles v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
PDF, Size: 92 KB

See Also

Is Expert Opinion Based Solely on Experience Admissible?

Court Case Digests
June 7, 2016

Court rules expert testimony based solely on experience may be admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, notwithstanding Daubert requirements.