Brown v. Progressive Mt. Ins. Co.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 26, 2024
6411 Insurance Agents, Brokers, and Service
524210 Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
economic damages & lost profits
damages, breach of contract, expert testimony, appraisal, cross-examination, rule 702, class action, motion to exclude, hearsay, comparable

Brown v. Progressive Mt. Ins. Co.
2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132448
US
Federal Court
Georgia
United States District Court
Dr. Michelle Lacey, Marc Spizzirri, Dr. Jonathan Walker
Timothy C. Batten Jr.

Summary

In discussing and ruling on motions to exclude portions of testimony of three experts in a class action case against Progressive Insurance for breach of contract in determining the actual cash value to be paid in valuing a used car, the court provided well-reasoned decisions as to the application of FRE 702. It was in effect a tutorial.
Brown v. Progressive Mt. Ins. Co.
PDF, Size: 369 KB

See Also

U.S. District Court (Georgia) Rules on Various Motions to Exclude Testimony Under FRE 702 (A Tutorial)

In discussing and ruling on motions to exclude portions of testimony of three experts in a class action case against Progressive Insurance for breach of contract in determining the actual cash value to be paid in valuing a used car, the court provided well-reasoned decisions as to the application of FRE 702. It was in effect a tutorial.