Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 15, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,567 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3577 Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
334118 Computer Terminal and Other Computer Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
damages, lost profits, reasonable royalty, panduit, entire market value rule (EMVR)
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc. (II)
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69335
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
James Malackowski (plaintiffs); Elizabeth Dean (defendants)
Grewal

Summary

On retrial, court finds EMVR is not necessary to present a viable lost profits theory and denies defendants’ motion to exclude plaintiffs’ damages evidence based on prior ruling that they had failed to show evidence to support an entire market value rule ...
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc. (II)
PDF, Size: 46 KB

See Also

Does Panduit Lost Profits Theory Require Apportionment?

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2013

On retrial, court finds EMVR is not necessary to present a viable lost profits theory and denies defendants’ motion to exclude plaintiffs’ damages evidence based on prior ruling that they had failed to show evidence to support an entire market value rule ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition