Blueblade Capital Opportunities LLC v. Norcraft Cos.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 27, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (27,141 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2434 Wood Kitchen Cabinets
337110 Wood Kitchen Cabinet and Countertop Manufacturing
shareholder dissent/oppression
beta, expert testimony, fair value, discounted cash flow (DCF), merger, merger price, statutory appraisal, synergy, projections, going concern value
Blueblade Capital Opportunities LLC v. Norcraft Cos.
2018 Del. Ch. LEXIS 255
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
David A. Clarke (petitioners); Yvette R. Austin Smith (respondent/company)
Slights

Summary

Chancery rejects deal price as indicator of fair value, citing problematic sales process, and rejects use of unaffected trading price, citing company’s lack of trading history; court instead relies on its own DCF analysis, drawing on the most credible aspects of each expert’s analysis.
Blueblade Capital Opportunities LLC v. Co.
PDF, Size: 3,779 KB

See Also

Flawed Sales Process Has Chancery Revert to DCF to Determine Fair Value

Court Case Digests
July 27, 2018

Chancery rejects deal price as indicator of fair value, citing problematic sales process, and rejects use of unaffected trading price, citing company’s lack of trading history; court instead relies on its own DCF analysis, drawing on the most credible aspects of each expert’s analysis.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law