Summary
The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment against Blue Cross in its antitrust suit against Marshfield Clinics. The clinics were guilty of monopolistic practices (i.e., division of the market).
Blue Cross and Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, and Compcare Health Services Insurance Corporation v
PDF, Size: 74 KB
See Also
Noncompetitive Factors Must Be Considered When Assessing Damages for a Division of the Market
The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment against Blue Cross in its antitrust suit against Marshfield Clinics. The clinics were guilty of monopolistic practices (i.e., division of the market).