Blinderman v. Reib

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 13, 1996
6411 Insurance Agents, Brokers, and Service
524210 Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
marital dissolution/divorce

Blinderman v. Reib
283 Ill. App. 3d 26, 669 N.E. 687, 218 Ill. Dec. 544
US
State Court
Illinois
Court of Appeals
Lawrence Lipsky (for petitioner) Leonard Frumm (for respondent)
Hartman

Summary

At issue is petitioner's expert testimony.

See Also

Specific industry experience not needed to qualify as expert

In this divorce action, husband contends that the circuit court shouldn't have considered the testimony of wife's valuation expert, Lawrence Lipsky, CPA, because Lipsky had no prior experience in valuing a company like Reib & Reib (R & R), husband's risk management insurance company.