Summary
On appeal husband challenges awards yet offered no testimony at trial, thus wife's testimony was used. It is noted it is the parties' duty to propose values of assets.
Blevins v. Blevins
PDF, Size: 35 KB
See Also
Tennessee follows mainstream: no foreseeable sale, no tax consequences
The couple was married in 1976, and wife filed for divorce in 2001. Husband and wife were both pharmacists, although wife had not worked for many years. Husband owned a pharmacy called Village Drugs.