Beverly Hills Concepts v. Schatz & Schatz (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 15, 1998

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (14,434 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7997 Membership Sports and Recreation Clubs
713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
malpractice (legal)
damages, economic damages & lost profits
Beverly Hills Concepts v. Schatz & Schatz (II)
247 Conn. 48, 717 A.2d 724, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 341
US
State Court
Connecticut
Supreme Court
Thomas Ferreira, CPA (for Beverly Hills)<br>Irwin Hochberg, CPA (for Schatz)
Katz

Summary

In legal malpractice action, issue was whether the trial court improperly made the award based on lost profits.

See Also

Connecticut Supreme Court Reverses $15 Million Award Because of Insufficient Damages Evidence

Legal and Court Case Update
November 1998

The Supreme Court of Connecticut has overturned a 1997 malpractice decision by the state's Superior Court (BVU, March 1997, p. 9) which awarded more than $15 million in malpractice damages to the plaintiffs.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition