Beverly Hills Concepts v. Schatz & Schatz (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 27, 1997

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (15,409 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7997 Membership Sports and Recreation Clubs
713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
malpractice (legal)
damages, economic damages & lost profits
Beverly Hills Concepts v. Schatz & Schatz (I)
1997 Conn. Super. LEXIS 178
US
State Court
Connecticut
Superior Court
Brian Wolfe and Irwin Hochberg (for defendant) <br>Harold Brown and Tom Ferreira (for plaintiff)
Hale

Summary

At issue is in this legal practice case is the establishment of expert testimony and circumstancial evidence.

See Also

Court Awards $15 Million Damages Based on Discounted Cash Flow

Legal and Court Case Update
March 1997

At issue is a legal malpractice action the corporate plaintiff, Beverly Hills Concepts Inc., brought against the law firm of Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & Kotkin.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition