Bakst v. United States of America (In re: Kane & Kane)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 16, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,444 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8111 Legal Services
541110 Offices of Lawyers
bankruptcy
Bakst v. United States of America (In re: Kane & Kane)
2012 Bankr. LEXIS 3223
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States Bankruptcy Court
Robert Zucker (plaintiff/trustee); James Reda and William Michaelson (defendant/government)
Kimball

Summary

In fraudulent conveyance suit, bankruptcy court admits expert’s testimony on reasonable compensation as it relates to reasonably equivalent value for the debtor law firm’s payment of its partners’ income taxes, but strikes insolvency expert’s opinion for ...
Bakst v. United States of America (In re: Kane & Kane
PDF, Size: 281 KB

See Also

Valuing Contingent Liability in Bankruptcy Precludes GAAP Standard

Legal and Court Case Update
October 2012

In fraudulent conveyance suit, bankruptcy court admits expert’s testimony on reasonable compensation as it relates to reasonably equivalent value for the debtor law firm’s payment of its partners’ income taxes, but strikes insolvency expert’s opinion for ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar