Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (IV)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 28, 2014

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,059 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4813 Telephone Communications, Except Radiotelephone
334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
lost profits, daubert, patent, non-infringing alternative, infringement
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (IV)
2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43907
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Christopher A. Vellturo, Ph.D. (Apple); unknown (Samsung)
Koh

Summary

Based on prior ruling requiring that analysis of off-the-market lost profits consider potential design-arounds as of the date of first infringement rather than the notice, court rejects Samsung’s pretrial motion to preclude calculation of Apple’s expert.
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (IV)
PDF, Size: 60 KB

See Also

Samsung’s About-Face on Off-the-Market Lost Profits Calculation

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2014

Based on prior ruling requiring that analysis of off-the-market lost profits consider potential design-arounds as of the date of first infringement rather than the notice, court rejects Samsung’s pretrial motion to preclude calculation of Apple’s expert.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar