Andrew Luce v. Terence Hanrahan

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 29, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,228 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7379 Computer Related Services, NEC
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
intellectual property
Andrew Luce v. Terence Hanrahan
No. A104153 (Cal. App. 1 Dist. 2005), unpublished
US
State Court
California
Court of Appeals
Gemello

Summary

The California Court of Appeals, First District reversed an unjust enrichment damages award in this misappropriation of trade secrets matter. The court ruled that the wrongdoer’s compensation should be deducted from the wrongdoer’s gross profits to the ex ...
Andrew Luce v. Terence Hanrahan
PDF, Size: 170 KB

See Also

Wrongdoer’s Compensation Should Be Considered in Calculating Unjust Enrichment Damages

Legal and Court Case Update
March 29, 2005

The California Court of Appeals, First District reversed an unjust enrichment damages award in this misappropriation of trade secrets matter. The court ruled that the wrongdoer’s compensation should be deducted from the wrongdoer’s gross profits to the ex ...

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition