AmBase Corp. v. United States

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 31, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (19,017 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6719 Offices of Holding Companies, NEC
551112 Offices of Other Holding Companies
winstar
AmBase Corp. v. United States
2011 WL 3891942 (Fed. Cl.)
US
Federal Court
United States Court of Federal Claims
Charles Calomiris (plaintiffs); Anthony Saunders and Roy Smith (defendant)
Smith

Summary

Federal Court of Claims accepts market value approach to valuing failed thrift in Winstar case, and rejects Gordon Growth model for failing to account for bank’s unstable earnings and its alternative investment opportunities in a “non-breach” world.
AmBase Corp. v. United States
PDF, Size: 161 KB

See Also

Market Value Approach Better Than Gordon Growth for Failed Bank

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2011

Federal Court of Claims accepts market value approach to valuing failed thrift in Winstar case and rejects Gordon growth model for failing to account for bank’s unstable earnings and its alternative investment opportunities in a “non-breach” world.