Adams v. Adams

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 14, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (15,072 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6282 Investment Advice
523999 Miscellaneous Financial Investment Activities
marital dissolution/divorce
tax affecting, capitalization of earnings, s corporation, partnership interest, bernier
Adams v. Adams
2011 WL 1385570 (Mass.)
US
State Court
Massachusetts
Supreme Court
Gregory Cowhey (wife); David Gannett (husband)
Cordy

Summary

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rejects direct capitalization method for valuing hedge fund partnership interest, finding DCF method is more appropriate, plus tax-affecting.
Adams v. Adams
PDF, Size: 90 KB

See Also

Post-Bernier Court Prefers DCF to Value Hedge Fund, Plus Tax Affects

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2011

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rejects direct capitalization method for valuing hedge fund partnership interest, finding DCF method is more appropriate, plus tax-affecting.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition