Summary
Even under the new FRE 702, testimony was admissible if it was “reliable” and based on an acceptable foundation and related to the case at hand. The expert in this case met all these requirements. Since the methodology the expert used was not challenged, that part of the new FRE 702 was not applicable. The court admitted the expert.
See Also
Am. Nw. Distribs. v. Four Roses Distillery LLC
Even under the new FRE 702, testimony was admissible if it was “reliable” and based on an acceptable foundation and related to the case at hand. The expert in this case met all these requirements. Since the methodology the expert used was not challenged, that part of the new FRE 702 was not applicable. The court admitted the expert.