U.S. District Court (Virginia) Denies Daubert Motion to Exclude Under New (2023) FRE 702

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
September 16, 2024

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (776 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6411 Insurance Agents, Brokers, and Service
524291 Claims Adjusting
economic damages & lost profits
damages, daubert, expert testimony, capitalization of earnings, rule 702, valuation methodology, reliability, motion to exclude, federal rules of evidence (FRE), but for causation
Hetrick v. iink
2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166885
US
State Court
Virginia
United States District Court
Brian Buss
David J. Novak

Summary

The FRE 702 rules were modified in December 2023 to strengthen the qualifications for admittance of expert testimony. In this case, the Virginia U.S. District Court allowed the expert to testify and denied the Daubert motion to exclude the testimony. Among other things, the court found that the testimony was relevant to the case at hand.

See Also

Hetrick v. iink

Full Text of Court Cases
September 16, 2024

The FRE 702 rules were modified in December 2023 to strengthen the qualifications for admittance of expert testimony. In this case, the Virginia U.S. District Court allowed the expert to testify and denied the Daubert motion to exclude the testimony. Among other things, the court found that the testimony was relevant to the case at hand.