SEC’s Daubert Challenge to Securities Valuation Testimony Fizzles

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
April 28, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,343 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6282 Investment Advice
523930 Investment Advice
securities litigation
daubert, expert testimony, fair value, securities, admissibility, fair market value (FMV), SSVS-1, reliability, expert report, uniform standards of professional appraisal practice (USPAP)
SEC v. Nutmeg Group, LLC
2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65196
US
Federal Court
Illinois
United States District Court
Peter Hickey (plaintiff/SEC); Anthony Garvy (defendants)
Gilbert

Summary

In an SEC case requiring valuation of restricted securities, court admits most of the testimony of parties’ experts; experts need not be specialists in given field and need not demonstrate familiarity with USPAP or SSVS to qualify under Daubert, court fin ...

See Also

SEC v. Nutmeg Group, LLC

Full Text of Court Cases
April 28, 2017

In an SEC case requiring valuation of restricted securities, court admits most of the testimony of parties’ experts; experts need not be specialists in given field and need not demonstrate familiarity with USPAP or SSVS to qualify under Daubert, court fin ...

SEC’s Daubert Challenge to Securities Valuation Testimony Fizzles

BVLaw Case Update
August 2017

In an SEC case requiring valuation of restricted securities, court admits most of the testimony of parties’ experts; experts need not be specialists in given field and need not demonstrate familiarity with USPAP or SSVS to qualify under Daubert, court fin ...