Plaintiff’s Projections Fail to Meet New York Test for Lost Profits or Lost Business Value

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
November 15, 2019

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,462 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3674 Semiconductors and Related Devices
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
economic damages & lost profits
breach of contract, daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, economic damages & lost profits, lost business value, expert qualifications, relevance
IceMOS Tech. Corp. v. Omron Corp.
2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198181
US
Federal Court
Arizona
United States District Court
Walter Bratic, Uzi Sasson, Greg Mischou (plaintiff); unknown (defendant)
Teilborg

See Also

IceMOS Tech. Corp. v. Omron Corp.

Full Text of Court Cases
November 15, 2019

In contract dispute, court denies defendant’s Daubert motions, finding plaintiff’s experts are qualified based on extensive experience in relevant industry; experts could provide testimony relevant to surviving lost development support costs claim and their testimony is not unreliable as of now.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 26 No. 2
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition