Persuasive’ Defense Expert Testimony Defeats ESOP Overpayment Claims

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
September 1, 2016

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,060 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5963 Direct Selling Establishments
454390 Other Direct Selling Establishments
ESOP valuations
expert testimony, breach of fiduciary duty, cash flow, comparable companies analysis, discounted cash flow (DCF), fair market value (FMV), multiple, projections, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization (EBITDA), employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), erisa, company specific risk, revenue forecasts
Fish v. GreatBanc Trust Co.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137351
US
Federal Court
Illinois
United States District Court
Robert Reilly (plaintiffs); Jeffrey Risius (defendants); Duff & Phelps (financial advisor to ESOP trustee)
Alonso

Summary

Court says defense expert opinion provides “credible and persuasive” support for court’s conclusion that ESOP financial advisor produced sound fairness and valuation opinions prior to contested transaction; there was no overpayment for stock at issue.

See Also

Fish v. GreatBanc Trust Co.

Full Text of Court Cases
September 1, 2016

Court says defense expert opinion provides “credible and persuasive” support for court’s conclusion that ESOP financial advisor produced sound fairness and valuation opinions prior to contested transaction; there was no overpayment for stock at issue.

Persuasive’ Defense Expert Testimony Defeats ESOP Overpayment Claims

BVLaw Case Update
December 2016

Court says defense expert opinion provides “credible and persuasive” support for court’s conclusion that ESOP financial advisor produced sound fairness and valuation opinions prior to contested transaction; there was no overpayment for stock at issue.