New Jersey Court Finds Defendant’s Actions Justify DLOM in Forced Buyout

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
December 22, 2016

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,710 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5193 Flowers, Nursery Stock, and Florists' Supplies
424930 Flower, Nursery Stock, and Florists' Supplies Merchant Wholesalers
judicial dissolution
fair value, net asset value, breach of fiduciary duty, buyout, capitalization rate, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), discounted cash flow (DCF), minority shareholder, projections, growth rate, book value, minority oppression, discount for lack of control (DLOC), historical income approach, company specific risk
Parker v. Parker
2016 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2720
US
State Court
New Jersey
Superior Court
Stephan C. Chait (plaintiff); Henry Fuentes (defendant)
Dupuis

Summary

In New Jersey fair value determination, following precedent, court finds defendant’s conduct justifies use of a marketability discount because he was oppressing shareholder who created “extraordinary circumstances” necessitating forced buyout; court rejec ...

See Also

Parker v. Parker

Full Text of Court Cases
December 22, 2016

In New Jersey fair value determination, following precedent, court finds defendant’s conduct justifies use of a marketability discount because he was oppressing shareholder who created “extraordinary circumstances” necessitating forced buyout; court rejec ...

New Jersey Court Finds Defendant’s Actions Justify DLOM in Forced Buyout

BVLaw Case Update
April 2017

In New Jersey fair value determination, following precedent, court finds defendant’s conduct justifies use of a marketability discount because he was oppressing shareholder who created “extraordinary circumstances” necessitating forced buyout; court rejec ...