Is Expert Opinion Based Solely on Experience Admissible?

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
June 7, 2016
6211 Security Brokers, Dealers, and Flotation Companies
523999 Miscellaneous Financial Investment Activities
securities litigation
daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, rule 702, securities fraud

Broyles v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74597
US
Federal Court
Louisiana
United States District Court
Theodore Urban (plaintiffs); unknown (defendants)
Brady

Summary

Court rules expert testimony based solely on experience may be admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, notwithstanding Daubert requirements.

See Also

Broyles v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.

Court rules expert testimony based solely on experience may be admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, notwithstanding Daubert requirements.

Is Expert Opinion Based Solely on Experience Admissible?

Court rules expert testimony based solely on experience may be admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, notwithstanding Daubert requirements.