Infringer’s Call for Apportionment of Lost Profits Goes Unheeded

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
March 16, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,785 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7373 Computer Integrated Systems Design
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
intellectual property
lost profits, patent infringement, reasonable royalty, panduit, apportionment, entire market value rule (EMVR)
Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. (I)
851 F.3d 1275
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Unknown (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Moore

Summary

Federal Circuit rejects challenge to lost profits award; patentee showed entitlement to lost profits from whole product by satisfying Panduit; although infringing product had multiple components, further apportionment in this case was not necessary.

See Also

Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. (I)

Full Text of Court Cases
March 16, 2017

Federal Circuit rejects challenge to lost profits award; patentee showed entitlement to lost profits from whole product by satisfying Panduit; although infringing product had multiple components, further apportionment in this case was not necessary.

Infringer’s Call for Apportionment of Lost Profits Goes Unheeded

BVLaw Case Update
November 2017

Federal Circuit rejects challenge to lost profits award; patentee showed entitlement to lost profits from whole product by satisfying Panduit; although infringing product had multiple components, further apportionment in this case was not necessary.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition