In COVID-19 Business Interruption Case, Court Finds Plaintiff ENT Practice Fails to Allege Any Harm to Insured Property

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
November 13, 2020

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (835 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
economic damages & lost profits
damages, insurance, business interruption loss, coronavirus, COVID-19, business interruption, physical loss
S. Fla. Ent Assocs. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213319
US
Federal Court
Florida
United States District Court
N/A
Torres

Summary

In this business interruption case resulting from mandatory shutdowns to control COVID-19, the court grants a motion to dismiss claims of the plaintiff. While the plaintiff claims losses due to COVID-19 shutdowns, the plaintiff fails to allege any actual harm to the insured property. Key Words: COVID-19, coronavirus, damages, physical loss, insurance, business interruption loss, business interruption ...

See Also

S. Fla. Ent Assocs. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Full Text of Court Cases
November 13, 2020

In this business interruption case resulting from mandatory shutdowns to control COVID-19, the court grants a motion to dismiss claims of the plaintiff. While the plaintiff claims losses due to COVID-19 shutdowns, the plaintiff fails to allege any actual harm to the insured property.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition