Expert Prevails by Documenting Adherence to Valuation Standards

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
June 29, 2016
7299 Miscellaneous Personal Services, NEC
812990 All Other Personal Services
fraud
daubert, expert testimony, normalization, admissibility, rule 702, SSVS-1, solvency, reliability, constructive fraud, reasonably equivalent value, forensic expert

MSKP Oak Grove, LLC v. Venuto
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84950
US
Federal Court
New Jersey
United States District Court
Shelley Brown (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Simandle

Summary

In fraud case, court rejects Daubert challenge, finding expert sufficiently identified assumptions and estimates she relied on and properly re-created subject company’s financial situation based on AICPA standards and authoritative valuation treatises.

See Also

MSKP Oak Grove, LLC v. Venuto

In fraud case, court rejects Daubert challenge, finding expert sufficiently identified assumptions and estimates she relied on and properly re-created subject company’s financial situation based on AICPA standards and authoritative valuation treatises.

Expert Prevails by Documenting Adherence to Valuation Standards

In fraud case, court rejects Daubert challenge, finding expert sufficiently identified assumptions and estimates she relied on and properly re-created subject company’s financial situation based on AICPA standards and authoritative valuation treatises.