Court Clarifies Application of Rule 703 to Expert Testimony

BVLaw
Court Case Digests
November 17, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,191 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5943 Stationery Stores
453210 Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
shareholder dissent/oppression
expert testimony, reasonable compensation, admissibility, waste, federal rules of evidence (FRE), minority oppression, hearsay
Springer v. Library Store
2017 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2378
US
State Court
Illinois
Appellate Court
Neil Gerber (plaintiff); Bethany Hearn (defendants)
Lytton

Summary

Court upholds lower court ruling that there was no mismanagement of corporate assets; plaintiff failed to show excessive officer compensation and was properly precluded from using testifying expert to introduce another appraiser’s report on excessive rent.

See Also

Springer v. Library Store

Full Text of Court Cases
November 17, 2017

Court upholds lower court ruling that there was no mismanagement of corporate assets; plaintiff failed to show excessive officer compensation and was properly precluded from using testifying expert to introduce another appraiser’s report on excessive rent.