A short—but searing—critique by an appellate court triggered a revaluation by the Tax Court of an estate’s minority interest in a limited partnership that owned timberland. The Tax Court chopped down its original valuation from $27.5 million to $14 million, which vindicated the estate’s own valuation.
Two clear errors: The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found the Tax Court made two clear errors: (1) it halved the company-specific risk premium the estate’s expert used without providing a good rationale; and (2) it gave some weight to the value of the assets even though a dissolution of the company was implausible.
The Tax Court’s revised valuation restored the estate expert’s company-specific risk premium (3.5%) and followed the appellate court’s order to use going-concern value, so it gave no weight to the assets of the company. This reduced the valuation difference by a whopping 93%.
The case is Estate of Giustina v. Commissioner, 2016 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 113 (June 13, 2016) (Giustina III). A case digest and the court’s opinion will be available in October at BVLaw. Digests of the two prior decisions and the courts’ opinions are already available at BVLaw.
Please let us know
if you have any comments about this article or enhancements you would like to see.