Attorneys more aggressive on solvency valuations

BVWireIssue #62-2
November 14, 2007

“I enjoyed reading, ‘Should Solvency Valuation Include Ongoing but Undiscovered Fraud?’ in the October BVU regarding the Edgewater Medical Center bankruptcy—and not only because I was the ‘credible expert’ in the case,” writes Patrick McNally, partner in charge of corporate finance consulting at Blackman Kallick (Chicago).  An interesting point in that case: The plaintiffs argued that the failure to exercise a lease option was a fraudulent transfer rather than the actual lease payments.  “It seems, based on my experience as a consultant/expert in several fraudulent transfer matters in the last twelve months,” McNally says, “that attorneys may be becoming more aggressive in the area of fraudulent transfers.” Indeed, a lead article in the current issue of ABA’s The Business Lawyer looks at “Proving Solvency: Defending Preference and Fraudulent Transfer Litigation.”   Look for an article from the perspective of valuation analysts, authored by McNally, in an upcoming Business Valuation Update.

Please let us know if you have any comments about this article or enhancements you would like to see.