When valuers are expected to supply a DCF analysis (an increasingly frequent need), most start with the risk assumption of a market premium compared to government bonds. As Pablo Fernandez reminds us in his latest publication:
[T]he market risk premium (MRP or ERP) is the answer to the following question: Knowing that your money invested in long-term Government bonds will provide you a return of RF% almost for sure, which additional return you require to another investment (in a portfolio with shares of most of the companies with shares traded in the financial markets) for feeling compensated for the extra risk that you assume?
In 'Normalized' Risk-Free Rate: Fiction or Science Fiction? however, Fernandez questions whether the valuation profession is causing itself some problems when valuers ‘fix’ the risk-free rate (which is near zero or even negative) when the current rate doesn’t create an accurate valuation.
He provides evidence with a model DCF analysis of a hypothetical large consulting and financial services firm (some UK business valuers may think they recognize Duff & Phelps as the model).
Fernandez identifies four cases where the ‘invented’ RfR creates an obvious fiction:
‘1) it does not exist: we cannot invest in any financial instrument and get the “Normalized Risk-Free rate” without (or with little) risk;
‘2) in several cases it is higher than the cost of debt;
‘3) in several cases it is higher than the required return to debt;
‘4) most valuations do not adjust the value of Debt accordingly to the “Normalized Risk-Free rate” they use.’
Please let us know
if you have any comments about this article or enhancements you would like to see.