Georgia-Pacific Analysis Satisfies Apportionment Requirement, Court Says

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 23 No. 5
BVLaw Case Update
May 2017

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (596 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3799 Transportation Equipment, NEC
336999 All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
expert testimony, discovery, expert draft report
Bombardier Rec. Prods. v. Arctic Cat Inc.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184531
April 19, 2016
US
Federal Court
Minnesota
United States District Court
N/A (plaintiffs); N/A (defendants)
Brisbois

Summary

Court says under federal discovery rule applicable to expert testimony annotated draft expert reports are discoverable as to comments one expert made to other expert’s draft report and as to portion of the draft to which comment was made.

See Also

Georgia-Pacific Analysis Satisfies Apportionment Requirement, Court Says

Court Case Digests
April 19, 2016

Court says under federal discovery rule applicable to expert testimony annotated draft expert reports are discoverable as to comments one expert made to other expert’s draft report and as to portion of the draft to which comment was made.