Expert’s FMV Analysis Aligns With Applicable Healthcare Law

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 23 No. 12
BVLaw Case Update
December 2017

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (820 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8071 Medical Laboratories
621511 Medical Laboratories
expert testimony
cost approach, daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, fair market value (FMV), reliability
United States ex rel. Lutz v. Berkeley Heartlab, Inc.
2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135678
August 22, 2017
US
Federal Court
South Carolina
United States District Court
Kathleen McNamara (plaintiff); Exponent (defendants)
Gergel

Summary

In healthcare case centering on Anti-Kickback Statute, court finds government expert’s FMV analysis of physician services, which excludes value and volume of referrals, accords with standard applying to AKS cases and is admissible under Daubert.

See Also

Expert’s FMV Analysis Aligns With Applicable Healthcare Law

Court Case Digests
August 22, 2017

In healthcare case centering on Anti-Kickback Statute, court finds government expert’s FMV analysis of physician services, which excludes value and volume of referrals, accords with standard applying to AKS cases and is admissible under Daubert.