Court Clarifies Rule 26 Protection for ‘Reporting’ and ‘Non-reporting’ Experts

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 22 No. 9
BVLaw Case Update
September 2016

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (344 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3999 Manufacturing Industries, NEC
339999 All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing
intellectual property
lost profits, expert testimony, admissibility, discovery, expert report, panduit
Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Elecs. Co.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93348
May 18, 2016
US
Federal Court
Minnesota
United States District Court
Donald Gorowsky (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Noel

Summary

Court says background information in expert’s report is what Rule 26 has in mind in requiring statement of “the facts or data considered by the witness” in forming his opinion; court clarifies discovery rules to communication with nonreporting expert.

See Also

Court Clarifies Rule 26 Protection for ‘Reporting’ and ‘Non-Reporting’ Experts

Court Case Digests
May 18, 2016

Court says background information in expert’s report is what Rule 26 has in mind in requiring statement of “the facts or data considered by the witness” in forming his opinion; court clarifies discovery rules to communication with nonreporting expert.