The case Estate of Helen P. Richmond, Deceased, Amanda Zerbey, Executrix, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, T.C. Memo 2014-26, was not your ordinary family limited partnership tax court case. The subject interest was a noncontrolling interest in a C corporation that held only marketable securities with significant built-in capital gains (BICGs). The case was heard in the 3rd Circuit, which—unlike the 5th and 11th Circuits that had previously accepted a dollar-for-dollar reduction in value for the BICG tax—had not ruled on this issue. Another interesting issue was the selection of the valuation approach; the estate expert relied on the income approach, whereas the IRS expert relied on the asset approach. This article comments on weaknesses in the court's valuation approach and why the income approach is a valid method when valuing a noncontrolling interest.
Copyright American Society of Appraisers
The information contained in this product is based on content obtained by ASA from sources considered to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be complete. BVR and ASA accept no liability for the use of such information which is provided "AS IS" and with no warranties, express or implied.