Back-solving Unobservable Trademark Royalty Rates—The Case of ITT vs Xylem Group

BVResearch Pro
American Society of Appraisers Business Valuation Review™
Summer 2017 Volume 36, Issue 2 pp. 67-77
Robert B. Morrison, ASA BV/IA
Christof U. Binder, MBA, PhD
intangibles
relief-from-royalty, royalty rate, fair value, markables, license agreement

Summary

Intangible assets like trademarks and patents are typically not traded on active markets, and the measurement of their fair values is based on valuation models that use significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs (i.e., guideline royalty rates under the relief-from-royalty method). Although widely accepted, all authors and lecturers emphasize the difficulties when determining guideline royalty rates under this method. Often, royalty rate analyses fail to survive audit, appeal, or other scrutiny. In developing robust Level 3 inputs, the appraiser must take into account all information that is reasonably available. A new approach is discussed, one that illustrates an alternative method with which to overcome difficulties in identifying and interpreting guideline license agreements. This approach was first introduced in a largely unnoticed lawsuit.
Back-solving Unobservable Trademark Royalty Rates—The Case of ITT vs Xylem Group
PDF, Size: 234 KB

Copyright American Society of Appraisers

The information contained in this product is based on content obtained by ASA from sources considered to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be complete. BVR and ASA accept no liability for the use of such information which is provided "AS IS" and with no warranties, express or implied.