A Review of Valuations in Delaware Appraisal Cases, 2004–2005

BVResearch Pro
American Society of Appraisers Business Valuation Review™
Summer 2006 Volume 25, Issue 2 pp. 44-63
Gilbert E. Matthews, MBA, CFA


The Delaware Court of Chancery decided an unusually high number of appraisal cases during 2004 and 2005. In an appraisal, the Court looks at a company as it exists at the date of the transaction—the “operative reality.” Actions planned by a third-party acquiror before a change of control are normally excluded in a Delaware appraisal, but should be taken into account in second-stage mergers. The Court used discounted cash flow as its primary valuation methodology. This may reflect the fact that cases involving profitable companies with good comparable companies are easier to settle. In applying the comparable company method, the Chancery Court has been applying control premiums, even in a case in which no testimony supported a control premium. The appraisal valuations in 2004–5 did not display a tendency in favor of either petitioner or respondent.
A Review of Valuations in Delaware Appraisal Cases, 2004–2005
PDF, Size: 192 KB

Copyright American Society of Appraisers

The information contained in this product is based on content obtained by ASA from sources considered to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be complete. BVR and ASA accept no liability for the use of such information which is provided "AS IS" and with no warranties, express or implied.